[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <485BFFC5.6020404@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:06:45 -0700
From: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [crash, bisected] Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86_64: Fold pda into per cpu
area
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>
> BTW, I think __per_cpu_load will cause trouble if you make a relocatable
> kernel, being an absolute symbol. But I have relocation off at the moment.
>
...
Here's where it's defined (in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h):
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ZERO_BASED_PER_CPU
#define PERCPU(align) \
. = ALIGN(align); \
percpu : { } :percpu \
__per_cpu_load = .; \
.data.percpu 0 : AT(__per_cpu_load - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
*(.data.percpu.first) \
*(.data.percpu.shared_aligned) \
*(.data.percpu) \
*(.data.percpu.page_aligned) \
____per_cpu_size = .; \
} \
. = __per_cpu_load + ____per_cpu_size; \
data : { } :data
#else
Can we generate a new symbol which would account for LOAD_OFFSET?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists