linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1214267338.21092.56.camel@brick>
Date:	Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:28:58 -0700
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] h8300: Use packed struct rather than memmove for
	unaligned access

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?

 include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
index b8d06c7..ab851e7 100644
--- a/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-h8300/unaligned.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
 #define _ASM_H8300_UNALIGNED_H
 
-#include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+#include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
 #include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
 #include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
 
-- 
1.5.6.290.gc4e15


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/