| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:29:00 -0700 From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> To: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xtensa: Use packed struct rather than memmove for unaligned access Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> --- There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove version could be removed? include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h index 8f3424f..1a242b2 100644 --- a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h +++ b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h @@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ #define _ASM_XTENSA_UNALIGNED_H #ifdef __XTENSA_EL__ -# include <linux/unaligned/le_memmove.h> +# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h> # include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h> # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le # define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le #elif defined(__XTENSA_EB__) -# include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h> +# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h> # include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h> # include <linux/unaligned/generic.h> # define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be -- 1.5.6.290.gc4e15 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists