[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1214267340.21092.58.camel@brick>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:29:00 -0700
From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] xtensa: Use packed struct rather than memmove for
unaligned access
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
---
There are only 3 arches that use the memmove implementation, do you see
any problems with using the packed struct implementation so the memmove
version could be removed?
include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
index 8f3424f..1a242b2 100644
--- a/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
+++ b/include/asm-xtensa/unaligned.h
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
#define _ASM_XTENSA_UNALIGNED_H
#ifdef __XTENSA_EL__
-# include <linux/unaligned/le_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/le_struct.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_le
# define put_unaligned __put_unaligned_le
#elif defined(__XTENSA_EB__)
-# include <linux/unaligned/be_memmove.h>
+# include <linux/unaligned/be_struct.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/le_byteshift.h>
# include <linux/unaligned/generic.h>
# define get_unaligned __get_unaligned_be
--
1.5.6.290.gc4e15
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists