| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:47:13 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> Cc: jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hugh@...itas.com, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2() On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:41:10PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi (miklos@...redi.hu) wrote: > > Is this nfs/fuse problem you described: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=121396920822693&w=2 > > Yes. I do not know fuse good enough, but it looks like if your patch only fixes issue for pages which are in splice buffer during invalidation, any subsequent call for splice() will get correct new data (at least invoke readpage(s)), but in the description of error there was a long timeout between reading and writing, so it was a fresh splice() call, which suddenly started to return errors. Is it possible that by having uptodate bit in place, but page was actually freed but not removed from all trees and so on, so it masked read errors? This may be not the right conclusion though :) -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists