[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KBXOs-00074q-NU@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:59:14 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: johnpol@....mipt.ru
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hugh@...itas.com,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2()
> > > > > Like __block_prepare_write()?
> > > >
> > > > That's called with the page locked and page->mapping verified.
> > >
> > > Only when called via standard codepath.
> >
> > It would be a grave error to call it without the page lock.
>
> Page is locked of course, but invalidated, removed from all trees and
> caches, i.e. grab, lock, check, unlock... invalidate, write into that
> page should fail, but it will not, since page is uptodate and
> prepare_write does not check mapping at all.
But callers do check after having locked the page.
> > > Instead of returning error when reading from invalid page, now you
> > > return old content of it?
> >
> > No, instead of returning a short count, it is now returning old
> > content.
>
> Or instead of returning error or zero and relookup page eventually,
> which can already contain new data, we get old data.
Umm, it doesn't make any sense to try to always get fresh data. If
you do read() on a file, the data may become old and invalid a
millisecond after the read finished. We can't and needn't do anything
about this.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists