[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1KBXSF-00076u-7Y@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 18:02:43 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: johnpol@....mipt.ru
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hugh@...itas.com,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm: dont clear PG_uptodate in invalidate_complete_page2()
> > > Is this nfs/fuse problem you described:
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=121396920822693&w=2
> >
> > Yes.
>
> I do not know fuse good enough, but it looks like if your patch only
> fixes issue for pages which are in splice buffer during invalidation,
> any subsequent call for splice() will get correct new data (at least
> invoke readpage(s)), but in the description of error there was a
> long timeout between reading and writing, so it was a fresh splice()
> call, which suddenly started to return errors.
>
> Is it possible that by having uptodate bit in place, but page was
> actually freed but not removed from all trees and so on, so it
> masked read errors? This may be not the right conclusion though :)
No, the mechanics of the problem are well understood. Only the
solution is problematic :)
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists