[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440806250958j691988c4q19278400dadf7e15@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:58:57 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Bernhard Walle" <bwalle@...e.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Limit E820 map when a user-defined memory map is specified
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu [2008-06-25 09:01]:
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 5:02 AM, Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de> wrote:
>> > }
>> > early_param("mem", parse_memopt);
>> > @@ -1023,6 +1025,7 @@ static int __init parse_memmap_opt(char *p)
>> > e820_add_region(start_at, mem_size, E820_RESERVED);
>> > } else {
>> > end_user_pfn = (mem_size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> > + e820_update_range(mem_size, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM, E820_RESERVED);
>> > }
>> > return *p == '\0' ? 0 : -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> > --
>>
>> only this one is needed now. but please change ULLONG_MAX to
>> ULLONG_MAX - mem_size
>
> Why can't we add that check at the beginning of e820_update_range() as
> you suggested?
that patch about fixing e820_update_rang is in tip/setup-memory.
so the one is supposed to be ok, but it is good to keep good input
parameter too.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists