lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080625170126.GA2482@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:01:26 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on
	resume


* Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz> wrote:

> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
> 
> If this could be sneaked into Ingo's tree for some automated testing, 
> that would be good.

sure - i have applied it to tip/out-of-tree. I'm equally nervous about 
this change - it affects every suspend+resume cycle that people do on 
those boxes which are working just fine currently.

btw., it would get a lot more coverage on my test-systems if this commit 
in tip/out-of-tree:

| commit 01259383c345d13b70efcc549439927ae64dc66d
| Author: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
| Date:   Fri May 16 10:12:36 2008 +0200
|
|     sleepy linux self-test

was upstream and if it was enabled more prominently, instead of hidden 
behind the rather obscure condition of:

  config PM_TEST_SUSPEND
        bool "Test suspend/resume and wakealarm during bootup"
        depends on SUSPEND && PM_DEBUG && RTC_LIB=y

and even then it needs certain other config options related to RTC_LIB 
to actually work during bootup.

As a result of all this obstruction, the automated testing i do, which 
builds and boots more than 1 random kernel per minute, will only run 
this self-test once every hour or so.

I dont mind if this option breaks boxes (that its purpose: it does the 
same thing that a real suspend+resume does and suspend+resume frequently 
breaks boxes), but right now it's all obscured so heavily which makes 
automated testing a lot harder than it should be.

it would be wonderful if this excellent suspend+resume self-test was 
upstream and was more prominent! :-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ