linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200806261040.00646.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:39:59 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think 
> > that this patch broke one of his boxes.
> > 
> > Is it so?
> 
> No! :-)
> 
> it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e. the 
> debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug patch 
> starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.)

Does it mean that the $subject patch doesn't break your test box after all?

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/