| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080626085110.GA18599@elte.hu> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:51:10 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think > > > that this patch broke one of his boxes. > > > > > > Is it so? > > > > No! :-) > > > > it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e. > > the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug > > patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.) > > Does it mean that the $subject patch doesn't break your test box after > all? it doesnt break it - i get the same suspend+resume breakage without that patch as well, if i do it manually. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists