[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806261056.07180.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:56:06 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, 26 of June 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Len seems to think that Rafael seems to think that Ingo seems to think
> > > > that this patch broke one of his boxes.
> > > >
> > > > Is it so?
> > >
> > > No! :-)
> > >
> > > it found a pre-existing suspend+resume breakage on a testbox. (I.e.
> > > the debug patch worked as i'd expect it to work. Every good debug
> > > patch starts its lifetime with a sharp spike of breakages it finds.)
> >
> > Does it mean that the $subject patch doesn't break your test box after
> > all?
>
> it doesnt break it - i get the same suspend+resume breakage without that
> patch as well, if i do it manually.
Okay, so I think the $subject patch is good to go, then.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists