[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200806261718.18006.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:18:17 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: monstr@...nam.cz
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
stephen.neuendorffer@...inx.com, John.Linn@...inx.com,
john.williams@...alogix.com, matthew@....cx, will.newton@...il.com,
drepper@...hat.com, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
vapier.adi@...il.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, hpa@...or.com,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/60] microblaze_v4: includes SHM*, msgbuf
On Thursday 26 June 2008, monstr@...nam.cz wrote:
> include/asm-microblaze/msgbuf.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-microblaze/shmbuf.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/asm-microblaze/shmparam.h | 14 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/asm-microblaze/msgbuf.h
> create mode 100644 include/asm-microblaze/shmbuf.h
> create mode 100644 include/asm-microblaze/shmparam.h
>
These files are ok, but IMHO they should be in asm-generic, since there
are already many identical copies.
While the implementation of these three, as well as ipcbuf.h and sembuf.h
could be better optimized for endianess and word size differences, I have
come to the conclusion that there is no point for them to really be
different, and uClibc expects this exact layout by default anyway.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists