[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080627075912.92AE43D6907@localhost>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: menage@...gle.com (Paul Menage)
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, maxk@...lcomm.com, pj@....com,
vegard.nossum@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] CGroups: Add a per-subsystem hierarchy lock
This patch adds a hierarchy_mutex to the cgroup_subsys object that
protects changes to the hierarchy observed by that subsystem. It is
taken by the cgroup subsystem for the following operations:
- linking a cgroup into that subsystem's cgroup tree
- unlinking a cgroup from that subsystem's cgroup tree
- moving the subsystem to/from a hierarchy (including across the
bind() callback)
Thus if the subsystem holds its own hierarchy_mutex, it can safely
traverse its ts own hierarchy.
This patch also changes the cpuset hotplug code to take
cpuset_subsys.hierarchy_mutex rather than cgroup_mutex, removing a
cyclical locking dependancy between cpu_hotplug.lock and cgroup_mutex.
---
This is just a first cut - a full version of this patch would also
make use of the hierarchy_mutex at other places in cpuset.c that use
the cgroup hierarchy, but I wanted to see what people thought of the
concept. It appears to keep lockdep quiet.
include/linux/cgroup.h | 10 ++++++++--
kernel/cgroup.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/cpuset.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/cgroup.h
===================================================================
--- lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -319,9 +319,15 @@ struct cgroup_subsys {
#define MAX_CGROUP_TYPE_NAMELEN 32
const char *name;
- /* Protected by RCU */
- struct cgroupfs_root *root;
+ /*
+ * Protects sibling/children links of cgroups in this
+ * hierarchy, plus protects which hierarchy (or none) the
+ * subsystem is a part of (i.e. root/sibling)
+ */
+ struct mutex hierarchy_mutex;
+ /* Protected by RCU, this->hierarchy_mutex and cgroup_lock() */
+ struct cgroupfs_root *root;
struct list_head sibling;
void *private;
Index: lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/cgroup.c
===================================================================
--- lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -728,23 +728,26 @@ static int rebind_subsystems(struct cgro
BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i]);
BUG_ON(!dummytop->subsys[i]);
BUG_ON(dummytop->subsys[i]->cgroup != dummytop);
+ mutex_lock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
cgrp->subsys[i] = dummytop->subsys[i];
cgrp->subsys[i]->cgroup = cgrp;
list_add(&ss->sibling, &root->subsys_list);
rcu_assign_pointer(ss->root, root);
if (ss->bind)
ss->bind(ss, cgrp);
-
+ mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
} else if (bit & removed_bits) {
/* We're removing this subsystem */
BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i] != dummytop->subsys[i]);
BUG_ON(cgrp->subsys[i]->cgroup != cgrp);
+ mutex_lock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
if (ss->bind)
ss->bind(ss, dummytop);
dummytop->subsys[i]->cgroup = dummytop;
cgrp->subsys[i] = NULL;
rcu_assign_pointer(subsys[i]->root, &rootnode);
list_del(&ss->sibling);
+ mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
} else if (bit & final_bits) {
/* Subsystem state should already exist */
BUG_ON(!cgrp->subsys[i]);
@@ -2291,6 +2294,29 @@ static void init_cgroup_css(struct cgrou
cgrp->subsys[ss->subsys_id] = css;
}
+static void cgroup_lock_hierarchy(struct cgroupfs_root *root)
+{
+ /* We need to take each hierarchy_mutex in a consistent order */
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) {
+ struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
+ if (ss->root == root)
+ mutex_lock_nested(&ss->hierarchy_mutex, i);
+ }
+}
+
+static void cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(struct cgroupfs_root *root)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) {
+ struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
+ if (ss->root == root)
+ mutex_unlock(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
+ }
+}
+
/*
* cgroup_create - create a cgroup
* @parent: cgroup that will be parent of the new cgroup
@@ -2342,8 +2368,10 @@ static long cgroup_create(struct cgroup
init_cgroup_css(css, ss, cgrp);
}
+ cgroup_lock_hierarchy(root);
list_add(&cgrp->sibling, &cgrp->parent->children);
root->number_of_cgroups++;
+ cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(root);
err = cgroup_create_dir(cgrp, dentry, mode);
if (err < 0)
@@ -2460,8 +2488,12 @@ static int cgroup_rmdir(struct inode *un
if (!list_empty(&cgrp->release_list))
list_del(&cgrp->release_list);
spin_unlock(&release_list_lock);
+
+ cgroup_lock_hierarchy(root);
/* delete my sibling from parent->children */
list_del(&cgrp->sibling);
+ cgroup_unlock_hierarchy(root);
+
spin_lock(&cgrp->dentry->d_lock);
d = dget(cgrp->dentry);
cgrp->dentry = NULL;
@@ -2504,6 +2536,7 @@ static void __init cgroup_init_subsys(st
* need to invoke fork callbacks here. */
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&init_task.tasks));
+ mutex_init(&ss->hierarchy_mutex);
ss->active = 1;
}
Index: lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/cpuset.c
===================================================================
--- lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3.orig/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ lockfix-2.6.26-rc5-mm3/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static void scan_for_empty_cpusets(const
static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
{
- cgroup_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&cpuset_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
top_cpuset.cpus_allowed = cpu_online_map;
top_cpuset.mems_allowed = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY];
@@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplu
*/
rebuild_sched_domains();
- cgroup_unlock();
+ mutex_unlock(&cpuset_subsys.hierarchy_mutex);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists