[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360806270057w2b2d3e56ob4dde9aacf42327b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:57:56 +0900
From: "MinChan Kim" <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Lee Schermerhorn" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...hat.com>,
"Daisuke Nishimura" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 8/10] fix shmem page migration incorrectness on memcgroup
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:41 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > mem_cgroup_uncharge() against old page is done after radix-tree-replacement.
>> > And there were special handling to ingore swap-cache page. But, shmem can
>> > be swap-cache and file-cache at the same time. Chekcing PageSwapCache() is
>> > not correct here. Check PageAnon() instead.
>>
>> When/How shmem can be both swap-cache and file-cache ?
>> I can't understand that situation.
>
> Hi
>
> see,
>
> shmem_writepage()
> -> add_to_swap_cache()
> -> SetPageSwapCache()
>
>
> BTW: his file-cache mean !Anon, not mean !SwapBacked.
Hi KOSAKI-san.
Thanks for explaining.
In the migrate_page_move_mapping, the page was already locked in unmap_and_move.
Also, we have a lock for that page for calling shmem_writepage.
So I think race problem between shmem_writepage and
migrate_page_move_mapping don't occur.
But I am not sure I am right.
If I am wrong, could you tell me when race problem happen ? :)
>
>
--
Kinds regards,
MinChan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists