[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486625E2.2020808@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:52:02 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: avorontsov@...mvista.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -rt] ide: workaround buggy hardware issues with preemptable
hardirqs
Hello.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>>> But some hardware (namely ULi M5228 in the ULi M1575 "Super South Brige")
>>> behaves in a strange way: it asserts interrupts as edge sensitive. And
>>> because preemptable IRQ handler disables PIC's interrupt, PIC will likely
>>> miss it.
>>>
>>>
>> Unmasking an IRQ should re-enable an edge detector in a PIC (or that
>> detector should even be independent from mask).
>>
> Should? Hm.. well, I can easily check it. Will just program the MPIC IRQ
> to edge sensitive, and see if it fixes the problem (not sure if I already
> tried this, I think I did try).
>
That will not help if edge detector is not active for masked out IRQs
(that's how i8259 behaves, IIRC) *and* you're getting the short IRQ
"pulses" but should help if IRQ is generated normally -- though in this
case the level trigger mode (with the same polarity) should work as well...
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists