[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <486626C8.7070705@firstfloor.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:55:52 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tim Connors <tconnors@...ro.swin.edu.au>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, dipankar@...ibm.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Vatsa <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n
Tim Connors wrote:
> Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> said on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:06:28 +0200:
>> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> disappeared then I'd call that a huge usability regression. Basically
>>> making ondemand useless.
>>>
>>> /me checks,..
>>>
>>> Yeah, on F9, my opteron runs at 1GHz when idle, but when I start distcc,
>>> which like said runs on nice 19, the cpu speed goes up to 2.4GHz.
>> Ok distcc is a special case,
>
> No it's not.
You're arguing against the current default of ondemand then.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists