linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: remove unused function aio_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200807011355.51049.knikanth@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:55:50 +0530
From:	Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
To:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
Cc:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  aio: remove unused function aio_run_iocbs()

On Monday 30 June 2008 23:10:50 Zach Brown wrote:
> Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de> writes:
> >> remove unused function aio_run_iocbs()
> >
> > Seems like it's time to just get rid of it.  See:
> >   http://ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0608.0/0048.html
> > for an explanation of why it's still there.
>
> Yeah, I'm still of the opinion that the cost of having to resurrect it
> if it's needed again isn't significant enough to keep it in the tree
> without callers.
>

Can't this function be kept as part of the out-of-tree patch itself? Or is it 
a module that requires this symbol? I do not see a EXPORT_SYMBOL*() for this, 
so it cannot be a module depending on this func!?

Thanks
Nikanth Karthikesan


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/