[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17ic6qauk.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:15:15 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> writes:
> Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic allocation. I have
> only build-tested it, but it seems to work.
>
> Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to -tip.
Looks reasonable to me. When generalizing from a test program to something
that can be used every day I think I just overlooked the fact that I had not
dynamically allocated the section count.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists