[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080701121827.GA25580@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:18:27 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fat: Fix VFAT_IOCTL_READDIR_xxx and cleanup for
userland
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 02:22:48PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Given that the current version can't actually work without defininig
> > it's own dirent and thus ioctl number symbolic name I wonder if these
> > ioctls are used at all? They must have been completely untested for
> > a while, and I suspect we'd be better off just removing them.
>
> I had the same thought, but when checking this I noticed that at least
> wine works around this problem:
Ok, I'll withdraw my objection in that case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists