linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] fat: Fix VFAT_IOCTL_READDIR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080701122039.GB25580@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 08:20:40 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fat: Fix VFAT_IOCTL_READDIR_xxx and cleanup for
	userland

>  
>  #include <linux/magic.h>
> +#include <asm/byteorder.h>

Why do we need this in the user-visible part of the header?

> +struct __fat_dirent {
> +	long		d_ino;
> +	__kernel_off_t	d_off;
> +	unsigned short	d_reclen;
> +	char		d_name[256]; /* We must not include limits.h! */
> +};

Any reason this is not called fat_dirent? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/