[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080701131714.5093fa49.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:17:14 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] bug.h: add empty warn_on_slowpath() for
CONFIG_BUG=n
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:33:39 -0700
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
>
> Add an empty function for warn_on_slowpath() when CONFIG_BUG=n so that
> this build error does not happen:
>
> linux-next-20080701/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmisc.c: In function 'acpi_ut_error':
> linux-next-20080701/drivers/acpi/utilities/utmisc.c:1028: error: implicit declaration of function 'warn_on_slowpath'
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/bug.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-next-20080701.orig/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ linux-next-20080701/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -81,4 +81,9 @@ extern void warn_on_slowpath(const char
> # define WARN_ON_SMP(x) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +static inline void warn_on_slowpath(const char *file, const int line)
> +{ }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif
>
This looks like a needed-in-mainline fix? or is there something in
linux-next which causes the bug?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists