linux-kernel - Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

On Tue, 1 Jul 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since next-20080630:
> > 
> > New tree: ttydev - unfortunately it had to be reverted because of build
> > failures after lots of conflict resolution (which may have caused the
> > build failures).
> > 
> > Changed tree: the cris tree changed branch names.
> > 
> > The sched tree gained a couple of conflicts against the ftrace and
> > cpus4096 trees.
> > 
> > The pci tree gained a conflict against the x86 tree.
> > 
> > The usb tree reverted due to a build failure after merging with the pci
> > tree was changed for a fixup patch.
> > 
> > The v4l-dvb tree lost its three conflicts against Linus' tree.
> > 
> > The s390 tree gained a conflict against the diver-core tree.
> > 
> > The ide tree fixed its build problems.
> > 
> > The nfsd tree lost a conflict against the nfs tree.
> > 
> > The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the ide tree.
> > 
> > The net tree gained two conflicts against the powerpc tree.
> > 
> > The galak tree lost its conflict against the net tree.
> > 
> > the blk-removal tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree.
> > 
> > The firmware tree lost several conflicts against the net tree so didn't
> > need a commit reverted any more.
> > 
> > Merging the ttydev tree got several conflicts against the usb and
> > firmware trees.  Unfortunately, it also would not build and so was
> > reverted.
> > 
> > I have also applied the following patches for know problems:
> > 	module: fix NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol()
> 
> I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel.  I get something of this sort in
> dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible:
> 
> [  314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> [  314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> [  314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported
> [  319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed
> 
> linux-next from yesterday was fine with the same .config .

Same problem for me.  Thanks for reporting it.
I wondered if it was something that I did wrong...

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/