linux-kernel - Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <BC46CA27-0F46-4F1B-950D-562B36B19A0B@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:49:32 -0400
From:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

On Jul 1, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 of July 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since next-20080630:
>>
>> New tree: ttydev - unfortunately it had to be reverted because of  
>> build
>> failures after lots of conflict resolution (which may have caused the
>> build failures).
>>
>> Changed tree: the cris tree changed branch names.
>>
>> The sched tree gained a couple of conflicts against the ftrace and
>> cpus4096 trees.
>>
>> The pci tree gained a conflict against the x86 tree.
>>
>> The usb tree reverted due to a build failure after merging with the  
>> pci
>> tree was changed for a fixup patch.
>>
>> The v4l-dvb tree lost its three conflicts against Linus' tree.
>>
>> The s390 tree gained a conflict against the diver-core tree.
>>
>> The ide tree fixed its build problems.
>>
>> The nfsd tree lost a conflict against the nfs tree.
>>
>> The powerpc tree gained a conflict against the ide tree.
>>
>> The net tree gained two conflicts against the powerpc tree.
>>
>> The galak tree lost its conflict against the net tree.
>>
>> the blk-removal tree gained a conflict against the s390 tree.
>>
>> The firmware tree lost several conflicts against the net tree so  
>> didn't
>> need a commit reverted any more.
>>
>> Merging the ttydev tree got several conflicts against the usb and
>> firmware trees.  Unfortunately, it also would not build and so was
>> reverted.
>>
>> I have also applied the following patches for know problems:
>> 	module: fix NULL pointer dereference in find_symbol()
>
> I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel.  I get something of this  
> sort in
> dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible:
>
> [  314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> [  314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> [  314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported
> [  319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed
>
> linux-next from yesterday was fine with the same .config .

What's your mount command line?

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/