[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4869D4A3.3020000@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:54:27 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The appended patch fixes a regression and is considered as 2.6.26
>> material. Everyone having a box with working suspend to RAM is gently
>> requested to test it and verify if it doesn't break things.
>>
>> The patch applies to the current -git.
>
> it's been under testing in tip/out-of-tree for about a week:
>
> | commit ee901dc1b9ab94a37ba2efc296fe9ba72bc75adf
> | Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> | AuthorDate: Tue Jun 24 23:03:48 2008 +0200
> | Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> | CommitDate: Wed Jun 25 18:48:13 2008 +0200
> |
> | x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
>
> no problems caused by it so far.
>
Here is the incremental patch which should stick "strictly to the
script" of ljmp immediately after writing CR0.PE. This should be done
to the boot code as well; I'm waiting for confirmation from the Elan
original reporter before submitting that patch.
I decided to make this an incremental patch to make it bisectable versus
the other one, however, it should probably be considered the right thing.
Note: I have not tested this beyond compilation, I'm afraid.
-hpa
View attachment "0002-x86-acpi-on-wakeup-ljmp-directly-after-writing-CR0.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3531 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists