lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:54:27 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> The appended patch fixes a regression and is considered as 2.6.26 
>> material. Everyone having a box with working suspend to RAM is gently 
>> requested to test it and verify if it doesn't break things.
>>
>> The patch applies to the current -git.
> 
> it's been under testing in tip/out-of-tree for about a week:
> 
> | commit ee901dc1b9ab94a37ba2efc296fe9ba72bc75adf
> | Author:     H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> | AuthorDate: Tue Jun 24 23:03:48 2008 +0200
> | Commit:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> | CommitDate: Wed Jun 25 18:48:13 2008 +0200
> |
> |     x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
> 
> no problems caused by it so far.
> 

Here is the incremental patch which should stick "strictly to the 
script" of ljmp immediately after writing CR0.PE.  This should be done 
to the boot code as well; I'm waiting for confirmation from the Elan 
original reporter before submitting that patch.

I decided to make this an incremental patch to make it bisectable versus 
the other one, however, it should probably be considered the right thing.

Note: I have not tested this beyond compilation, I'm afraid.

	-hpa

View attachment "0002-x86-acpi-on-wakeup-ljmp-directly-after-writing-CR0.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (3531 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists