[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4869D67B.4060902@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:02:19 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The appended patch fixes a regression and is considered as 2.6.26
>> material. Everyone having a box with working suspend to RAM is gently
>> requested to test it and verify if it doesn't break things.
>>
>> The patch applies to the current -git.
>
> it's been under testing in tip/out-of-tree for about a week:
>
> | commit ee901dc1b9ab94a37ba2efc296fe9ba72bc75adf
> | Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> | AuthorDate: Tue Jun 24 23:03:48 2008 +0200
> | Commit: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> | CommitDate: Wed Jun 25 18:48:13 2008 +0200
> |
> | x86 ACPI: normalize segment descriptor register on resume
>
> no problems caused by it so far.
>
It still seems incredibly risky to push this for 2.6.26, especially
given the Elan revelation. I think it needs to be tested on the 2.6.27
track, and then possibly be pushed back via the 2.6.26-stable route.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists