linux-kernel - Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:15:11 -0400
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	chucklever@...il.com
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inux-next: Tree for July 1

On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 10:34 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 22:36 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> I can't mount NFS shares with this kernel.  I get something of this sort in
> >> dmesg and it seems to be 100% reproducible:
> >>
> >> [  314.058858] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
> >> [  314.058863] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
> >> [  314.490970] RPC: transport (0) not supported
> >> [  319.246987] __ratelimit: 23 messages suppressed
> >
> > Does this patch fix the problem for you?
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> > NFS: Fix the mount protocol defaults for binary mounts
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  fs/nfs/super.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
> > index e09b1c2..85fbb98 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
> > @@ -1575,6 +1575,7 @@ static int nfs_validate_mount_data(void *options,
> >
> >                if (!(data->flags & NFS_MOUNT_TCP))
> >                        args->nfs_server.protocol = XPRT_TRANSPORT_UDP;
> > +               nfs_set_transport_defaults(args);
> 
> nfs_set_transport_defaults() is overkill for the legacy mount path.
> The bug is that the logic here assumes that nfs_server.protocol
> already has the default value of XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP, but commit
> 8b59ea3c removed that default.  The correct fix is to add
> 
>             args->nfs_server.protocol = XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP;
> 
> just before the 'if' statement.  We should fold that into 8b59ea3c to
> preserve bisectability.

NACK. You still need to set the appropriate retrans and timeo defaults.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/