[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080702171637.GB7003@cvg>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:16:38 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 6/7] x86: traps_xx: modify default_do_nmi
[Alexander van Heukelum - Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:39:01PM +0200]
| - local caching of smp_processor_id() in default_do_nmi()
| - v2: do not split default_do_nmi over two lines
|
| Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
|
| ---
|
| On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 08:12:20PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > | -static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
| > | +static notrace __kprobes void
| > | +default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
| > | [ ... ]
| > | -asmlinkage notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
| > | +asmlinkage notrace __kprobes void
| > | +default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
| >
| > Hi Alexander, good done, thanks! But why did you split default_do_nmi
| > definition by two lines? I think it would be better to keep them as it
| > was before, ie by a single line
| >
| > static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
| Thanks! Here is the replacement patch with default_do_nmi left on
| a single line. Patch 7 applies with 1 line fuzz.
|
| Greetings,
| Alexander
|
Thanks, Alexander, this looks good to me. Feel free to add my
Signed-off if you need it.
- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists