[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215032573.21182.59.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:02:53 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
ksummit-2008-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Delayed interrupt work, thread pools
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 16:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> As for interrupt threads, those would help for some non-RT issues
> (having a better desktop feel) but not for the issue that Ben has been
> stating. I would be interested in knowing exactly what is needing to
> handle a page fault inside the kernel. If we need to do something for a
> user space task, as soon as that task is found the work should be passed
> to that thread.
Not much is needed, as the mm is passed as an argument to
handle_mm_fault(). Page faults can already be handled by 'other'
processes (get_user_pages() doesn't have to be called in the context of
the target mm). I need to check if we may not get into funky issues down
at the vfs level if using a kernel thread without files and I may need
to dbl check if anything in that path tries to signal but that's about
it afaik.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists