| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 12:34:38 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: "Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@...rs.sourceforge.net> Cc: "Kernel development list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Battery life difference On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 20:41:07 +0300 "Felipe Balbi" <felipebalbi@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > Cool, now I'm using current linux 2.6.26-rc8 from git > b8a0b6ccf2ba2519ace65d782b41ee91bf3c3778 > > Now I'm reaching 9.8w consumption :-) > > Really good improvements. cool > > btw, any plans to move some of the powertop features to acpid ? > I mean, the wireless pm for iwl4965 could be there, couldn't it ? actually.. it needs to/is moving into the driver. This sort of decision needs to just happen locally in the driver; the idea that you can make power decisions (rather than policy decisions) on a global level is just no longer true (if it ever was). Actually I thought this was already in the 2.6.26-rc kernel series driver... -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists