[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878wwg4l6b.fsf@saeurebad.de>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 11:36:44 +0000
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] documentation: update CodingStyle tips for Emacs users
Hi,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 19:52:16 +0200
> Johannes Weiner <hannes@...urebad.de> wrote:
>
>> +(add-hook 'c-mode-hook
>> + (lambda ()
>> + (let ((filename (buffer-file-name)))
>> + ;; Enable kernel mode for the appropriate files
>> + (when (and file
>> + (string-match "/usr/src/linux" filename))
>
> Shouldn't that be "(and filename ..." rather than "file"?
Whoops, you are right.
> A test for /usr/src/linux seems misplaced, though; I don't think a
> whole lot of people keep their kernel trees there anymore. There must
> be a better heuristic one can use to figure out whether a kernel source
> file is being edited.
Is this really needed? I think most people have their kernel trees in
one directory and I used /usr/src/linux explicitely because it is so
well known and whoever reads this snippet knows what to substitute it
for.
But perhaps it should be "~/src/linux-trees/" to emphasize that it it
matches everything descendant from this directory.
A heuristics seems overkill as this snippet is not distributed code that
needs to be portable but it is just a tip for ones .emacs. I don't want
heuristics in my .emacs if I know exactly where my kernel trees are.
But then, we should remove the check for linux-files completely and make
people use this coding style for every code they write ;)
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists