[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487142BA.1080508@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 00:10:02 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25
On 06-07-08 23:56, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> BTW, the automated emails I'm sending are to let the reporters know
> that I'm interested in the current status of the bug. They are free
> not to reply to them, but in that case I assume they don't really
> care whether or not I'm tracking the bugs they reported.
I did/do wonder by the way when I get them if I should be replying if
the status is unchanged from my viewpoint...
I believe your automated emails say something like "please verify if
this problem is still relevant" but don't spell out what do after you
verified that it is. It's sort of natural to take that as "I need to
reply telling people it's fixed if it is but can remain silent if
nothing changed".
Being more explicit about liking a reporter to report "yes, nothing
changed" would probably be good if that IS what's wanted.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists