[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807061524510.3016@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2008 15:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@...monizer.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> When did you tell me that maintainers should not or cannot be Cc'ed on
> regression reports?
That is not what I'm complaining about.
I'm complaining about the fact that you *always* argue against closing
bugreports.
You have argued against it for over a YEAR now. And every single time I
tell you that you are wrong, and exactly *why* you are wrong.
If a reporter doesn't respond to say "it's still open", it needs to be
closed. It doesn't matter one whit whether there has been developer action
on it or not. We cannot keep old reports open - it's a total waste for
developers to even _look_ at anything that is more than roughly a month
old and hasn't been verified to be still be an issue.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists