[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m363rhhbex.fsf@gravicappa.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:05:58 +0200
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce copy_user_handle_tail routine
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> See? We don't actually care about vma boundaries or anything like that. We
> just care about the only boundary that matters for faults: the page
> boundary.
I was thinking about find_vma() for memset, but, yes, it should never
fail in kernel space (unless bug) and find_vma() is unnecessary.
--
wbr, Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists