[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080709130305.GB20768@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:03:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Introduce copy_user_handle_tail routine
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
>
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> >
> > > Now, the stuff that comes *before* that point is the "try to fix up one
> > > byte at a time" thing, which I'd like to be simple and dumb. At least to
> > > start with.
> >
> > Just to be clear: do these patches are good enough now (to start
> > with)? Or, may be, it needs to be further improved?
>
> I think they are getting there. I'm obviously not merging them in
> 2.6.26, but I'd be happy to do so for .27.
>
> Obviously, I'd be even happier if it also went through the normal x86
> review cycles (ie Ingo &co), but the current series is largely ack'ed
> by me.
applied them to tip/x86/core, for v2.6.27 merging, thanks everyone.
I've added Linus's Acked-by. Vitaly, could you please send your
Signed-off-by line, it was missing from the patches. You can check the
current form of the commits via:
git-pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86/core
(the patches changed slightly, there was some merge fallout due to other
changes in this area.)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists