[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1215475215.6036.10.camel@w-amax.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:00:15 -0700
From: Max Asbock <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/9] Use 64bit x86 machine check code for 32bit too
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 14:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> This patchkit uses the 64bit machine check code which is better in many
> >> ways on 32bit x86 too. This is also the basis for some future machine
> >> check work.
> >
> > Hi Andi,
> >
> > I tried applying your patch kit to -tip, but I'm getting build failures
> > on i386; gcc-4.1.1-51.fc5.x86_64 with attached configuration.
> >
>
> FWIW, this is rooting the branch on top of current linus. Applied on
> top of tip/auto-x86-next or tip/master, the patch does not apply.
>
> -hpa
The patches won't apply to -tip because Venki's patch has to be backed
out of mce_64.c and it looks like thread_info.h has been merged in the
mean time.
I was able to apply the patches to 2.6.26-rc8 though, build it and boot
it.
However it turns out the build warnings about
"mce_64.c:822: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘strict_strtoull’ makes
integer from pointer without a cast"
are justified. It looks like strict_strtoull has the last two arguments
switched with respect to simple_strtoull. You get a NULL pointer
dereference as soon as you write to one of the machinecheck sysfs
control files.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists