linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [0/9] Use 64bit x86 machine check code for 32bit too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080708002511.GA9366@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jul 2008 02:25:11 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Max Asbock <masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/9] Use 64bit x86 machine check code for 32bit too

> However it turns out the build warnings about 
> "mce_64.c:822: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘strict_strtoull’ makes
> integer from pointer without a cast"
> are justified. It looks like strict_strtoull has the last two arguments
> switched with respect to simple_strtoull. You get a NULL pointer
> dereference as soon as you write to one of the machinecheck sysfs
> control files.

Yes, shutting up checkpath's blatterings without full retesting was a 
mistake.  I fixed that in the last iteration I posted earlier.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/