[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080711121850.dfd60681.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:18:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ReiserFS Mailing List <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: discard prealloc in reiserfs_delete_inode
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:37:06 -0400 Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> wrote:
> With the removal of struct file from the xattr code, reiserfs_file_release()
> isn't used anymore, so the prealloc isn't discarded. This causes hangs
> later down the line.
>
> This patch adds it to reiserfs_delete_inode. In most cases it will be
> a no-op due to it already having been called, but will avoid hangs with xattrs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
> ---
> fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ void reiserfs_delete_inode(struct inode
> goto out;
> reiserfs_update_inode_transaction(inode);
>
> + reiserfs_discard_prealloc(&th, inode);
> +
> err = reiserfs_delete_object(&th, inode);
>
> /* Do quota update inside a transaction for journaled quotas. We must do that
Can you please remind us when "the removal of struct file from the xattr
code" happened?
Because hangs aren't good, and 2.6.25 might want this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists