[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080711121842.070c1342.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:18:42 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
Takahiro Yasui <tyasui@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] markers: avoid call_rcu_sched if old is NULL
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:02:01 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu (mhiramat@...hat.com) wrote:
> > Introduce marker_entry_free_old() and check old pointer is NULL before
> > setting call_rcu_sched(), because marker_entry_remove/add_probe() can
> > return NULL.
> >
>
> Hi Masami,
>
> I doubt this is a bug per se, because kfree accepts NULL pointers (and
> kfree is the only action done on the oldptr by free_old_closure).
>
> This cleans up the code, so I think it's good to merge your patch, but I
> would definitely not classify this as a bugfix.
>
> Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
I cannot get this to apply on the rather dated tree which I have on this
rather not-on-the-internet machine. Please merge this patch locally, test,
rewrite the changelog and resend it to someone ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists