lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080711155844.efab6a96.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:58:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, jirislaby@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a const assignment in moxa_load_fw()

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:48:21 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Appears to already be fixed in linux-next, perhaps by this:
> 
> Some of the maintainers have already pushed through the patches I've sent to
> you and them.
> 

No, that was a week-old tree - the warning was fixed independently.  As
they often are - everyone gets to watch them fly past so lots of people
are motivated to fix them, and are able to test their fixes.

linux-next would be a better tree against which to do this sort of
thing.  Doing that would avoid this wasted effort, plus linux-next has
lots of nice new warnings to keep us occupied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ