linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix a const assignment in moxa_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:58:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, jirislaby@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a const assignment in moxa_load_fw()

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:48:21 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Appears to already be fixed in linux-next, perhaps by this:
> 
> Some of the maintainers have already pushed through the patches I've sent to
> you and them.
> 

No, that was a week-old tree - the warning was fixed independently.  As
they often are - everyone gets to watch them fly past so lots of people
are motivated to fix them, and are able to test their fixes.

linux-next would be a better tree against which to do this sort of
thing.  Doing that would avoid this wasted effort, plus linux-next has
lots of nice new warnings to keep us occupied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/