[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080712092647.7f379d99.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 09:26:47 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, jirislaby@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix a const assignment in moxa_load_fw()
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 12:20:56 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Appears to already be fixed in linux-next, perhaps by this:
>
> commit b30a6a47716ba1a5112b44f0a3962daff961935e
> Author: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
> Date: Fri Jul 4 19:18:14 2008 +1000
>
> 83-tty-moxa-warning
Which became 88-tty-moxa-warning and was dropped (the individual patch)
from next-20080711 because it didn't apply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
>
> which, err, isn't in today's linux-next because the whole tty tree got
> accidentally dropped. Not that this was a tty patch.
All except two patches from the ttydev tree are in
"today's" (next-20080711) linux-next tree. (The tag is better than
saying "today" since I am in a different time zone to most of you :-))
The whole tree was dropped a few days ago but came back.
> Hopefully the patches in this tree will get title and changelog repairs
> before they go much further. I suspect a lot of this damage was due to
> incompatibility between Alan's patch-file format and the expectations of
> Stephen's scripts.
Yeah, Alan and I need to have a conversation about that ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists