[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4877EA9A.1070700@qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:19:54 -0700
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
CC: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, miaox@...fujitsu.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: current linux-2.6.git: cpusets completely broken
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Does the patch below help?
>
> (non-white-space-damaged version is attached)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 9fceb97..ae61dc9 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -1912,11 +1912,21 @@ static void common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug(void)
> static int cpuset_handle_cpuhp(struct notifier_block *unused_nb,
> unsigned long phase, void *unused_cpu)
> {
> - if (phase == CPU_DYING || phase == CPU_DYING_FROZEN)
> + swicth (phase) {
> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> + case CPU_DEAD:
> + case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN:
> + common_cpu_mem_hotplug_unplug();
> + break;
> + default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
I was always wondering why we're running that logic for every hotplug
event.
For example, do we care for UP_CANCELED* and DOWN_FAILED* ? Presumably
nothing should've changed, no ?
btw I'm just going by the name of the event. So UP_CANCELED to me sounds
like CPU never got to the ONLINE stage and cpuset should not really care.
Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists