[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080713012816.8c136efa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:28:16 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Jakub W. Jozwicki" <jozwicki@...er.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgross@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.10] pm_qos_params: change spinlock to rwlock
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:19:19 +0200 "Jakub W. Jozwicki" <jozwicki@...er.pl> wrote:
> Concurrent calls to pm_qos_requirement shouldn't block each other. This patch
> changes spinlock to rwlock and fixes issues with PREEMPT_RT.
"fixes issues" is nowhere near an adequate description.
Please provide complete descriptions for kernel patches. That includes
describing the mysterious "issue" in full!
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists