lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:12:47 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] core, x86: make LIST_POISON less deadly


* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >  
> > +config ILLEGAL_POINTER_VALUE
> > +       hex
> > +       default 0 if X86_32
> > +       default 0xffffc10000000000 if X86_64
> 
> This looks like a singularly bad pointer value on x86-64.
> 
> Why not pick something that is *guaranteed* to fault? The above looks 
> like any future setup that supports 41 bits of addressing and has 
> extended the page tables (yes, it will happen eventually) will find 
> that to be a perfectly valid address?
> 
> It's also visually confusing, since it's visually very close to a real 
> kernel pointer too.
> 
> Grr.
> 
> Why not use something sane like 0xdead000000000000, which has the high 
> bit set but very fundamentally isn't a valid pointer, and never will 
> be? And which is a *lot* more visually obvious too!

initially i suggested that too - but such addresses raise a #GP instead 
of a page fault so their decoding is a bit harder.

We dont do any instruction decoding in #GP handlers to figure out what 
happened, while in the pagefault case we know which address faulted, 
etc.

Perhaps we could try to make #GP handlers a bit more informative - 
although decoding instructions will make things a bit more fragile 
inevitably.

Perhaps make it 0xffffcdead0000000 ?

in any case, please ignore this topic until it's all worked out - no 
other topics depend on this one so it can be skipped safely.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ