lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
To:	Linus Torvalds <>
cc:	Arjan van de Ven <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	David Woodhouse <>,,
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,
 use it in more drivers.

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, wrote:
>> there was also the issue that was raised about how to handle firmware during
>> suspend/resume. I don't remember seeing a happy solution to that one.
> I don't understand why this even keeps coming up.
> The only reliable way to handle it is to load the firmware before the
> suspend happens - preferably by simply never unloading it in the first
> place.
> Anything else is fraught with problems.
> Stuff that expects to eject itself anyway(*) over a suspend event can
> obviously decide to throw it away and require a reload at resume time (by
> virtue of simply re-discovering the whole device!).
> Everybody else should just keep the firmware in memory in the driver.
> Does it waste some ram? Sure. Tough.

I agree with this, but the proponents of the seperate firmware are listing 
the fact that the firmware doesn't tie up ram as one of the big reasons 
for making the change.

David Lang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists