[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1216137578.2747.16.camel@jaswinder.satnam>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:29:38 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder@...radead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Introducing asm-x86/syscalls.h
Hello David,
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 07:58 -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I don't like this bit though:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
> > @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct getcpu_cache;
> > #include <linux/quota.h>
> > #include <linux/key.h>
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > +#include <asm/syscalls.h>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > asmlinkage long sys_time(time_t __user *tloc);
> > asmlinkage long sys_stime(time_t __user *tptr);
> > asmlinkage long sys_gettimeofday(struct timeval __user *tv,
>
> We're going to want to do this for all architectures, aren't we? Perhaps
> it's better to provide <asm/syscalls.h> for all architectures from the
> beginning, and not bother with the ifdef? Or if you must have an ifdef,
> perhaps make it on something like ARCH_HAS_ASM_SYSCALLS_H rather than
> having to change it every time an architecture adds its own
> <asm/syscalls.h> file?
>
OK, I will also create asm/syscalls.h for all the architectures.
Thank you,
Jaswinder Singh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists