[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0807151431150.15149@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:33:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Hideo AOKI <haoki@...hat.com>,
Takashi Nishiie <t-nishiie@...css.fujitsu.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 01/15] Kernel Tracepoints
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> I'm also wondering if it's better to have :
>
> filemap.h
> fs.h
> hugetlb.h
> ipc.h
> ipv4.h
> ipv6.h
> irq.h
> kernel.h
> memory.h
> net.h
> page.h
> sched.h
> swap.h
> timer.h
This might be a better idea.
>
> all in include/trace/ or to create subdirectories first, like :
>
> include/trace/net/
> include/trace/mm/
I think that is too much. A single trace directory should be sufficent.
> ....
>
> or to go the other way around and re-use the existing subdirectories :
>
> include/net/trace/
> include/mm/trace/
> ....
I'm definitely against that.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists