[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <487CED7C.4060401@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:33:32 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: david@...g.hm, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,
use it in more drivers.
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Can't you see that changing build processes takes time? Fixing driver disk
>> creation tools take time? Validating that each driver is packaged with its
>> correct firmware takes time?
>
> Umm. Can't you see that if we don't start doing it, it will never get done
> AT ALL?
>
> Yes, this will take time.
Which, by implication, means that userland is not -already- prepared.
Which means that if you don't have a recent userland of a mainstream
distro, the result is non-working drivers.
Which is the type of regression I thought we did not want.
> But that's not an argument for not merging it. Quite the reverse.
This is not an either/or proposition, and that is what you are missing.
The change should go in _while at the same time_ not creating regressions.
The change is not the problem.
That the change exists without the ability to recreate similar outputs
(i.e. firmware in module) is the problem.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists