[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807151420550.2867@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, david@...g.hm,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,
use it in more drivers.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Kernel 2.6.26. Older userland w/ initrd requirement, plus module w/
> compiled-in firmware.
>
> Simply dropping 2.6.27 into that situation will produce an unbootable system,
> since the firmware would not get copied into the initrd.
Umm. Neither would the module.
So I assume you are doing the module load from the disk, not the initrd?
Or are you rebuilding the module into the initrd? If so, why didn't you do
the firmware too and my "load directly from file" idea which is pretty
simple? IOW, what's the fundamnetal problem here?
But hey, if you _do_ the "link it together", go ahead. I don't see why
it's so magically superior, but I wanted it for the compiled-in driver
case, so it's not fundamentally different from that either. And I can't
really find the energy to care any more.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists