linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:27:31 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	petkovbb@...glemail.com, jrigby@...escale.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:06:55AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> 
> The patch named "powerpc/mpc5121: Add clock driver", also contained
> an unrelated and bogus change to the top-level makefile.  This patch
> backs out the bad bit.
> 
> SHA1 of offending patch: 137e95906e294913fab02162e8a1948ade49acb5)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> ---
> 
> If the maintainer who picked up this patch (Grant Likely) had done
> his job, this cack-up never would have happened.  Why do we still
> have to deal with such sloppy individuals?
> 
I think the more important question is why the hell would anyone put that
in a Makefile, ever? ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/