linux-kernel - [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:06:55 -0600
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	petkovbb@...glemail.com, jrigby@...escale.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix collateral damage to top level Makefile

From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>

The patch named "powerpc/mpc5121: Add clock driver", also contained
an unrelated and bogus change to the top-level makefile.  This patch
backs out the bad bit.

SHA1 of offending patch: 137e95906e294913fab02162e8a1948ade49acb5)

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
---

If the maintainer who picked up this patch (Grant Likely) had done
his job, this cack-up never would have happened.  Why do we still
have to deal with such sloppy individuals?

Ben/Linus;  I assume one of you will want to pick this up soonish?
Otherwise, I'll add it to my tree and it will be part of my next
pull request.

g.

 Makefile |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1564577..6192922 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-FRED=42
 VERSION = 2
 PATCHLEVEL = 6
 SUBLEVEL = 26

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/